Before it was filled with dawdling tourists bending their heads back to look up at the Fernsehturm, and before the U-bahn station and Döblin’s nightlife, and before the enterprising Jews from the eastern marshes arrived and occupied the ‘Scheunenviertel’, what is now Alexanderplatz, home of the World Clock, was a cattle market where outsiders would come to trade their stock and try to make a living. Since the Friesians, still cheap and with space to fill, Berlin has continued to thrive as a ‘Welstadt’, welcoming the rest of the world to its streets, from desperate refugees to the pleasure-seeking wealthy. Kreuzberg over the last twenty-five years has received the king’s portion of this influx, and it is in this kebab and hostel saturated district that a wall can be found sporting the words: ‘Echter Berliner!!!! Ihr Nicht Fuck You’.
It is from this
piece of graffiti that Daniel Brunet found the title and inspiration for his
piece of documentary theatre staged this month at the English Theatre Berlin,
part of the ‘Aliens of Extraordinary Abilities?’ project. Considering what
makes a real Berliner, Brunet and the other five in his cast – all from an
‘expat’ or ‘immigrant’ community – interviewed ten people from that respective
community, exploring the shared and differing experiencing of moving to and
living in Berlin. Together they collected over 115, 000 words, and it is from
these testaments, performed on stage verbatim, that Brunet and his cast devised
their piece of theatre, asking, what makes and who is an ‘Echter Berliner’?
Brunet commences
his production at the Ausländerbehörde, the bureaucracy centre for all
foreigners in the city, provoking sensations ranging from tedium to fear. Upon
arrival each member of the audience is given a coloured ticket dependent on
their country of origin and are curtly informed that ‘There is likely to be a
delay in the commencement of the performance this evening’. Indeed, it is not
until fifteen minutes after the stated starting time that the first group of
coloured ticket holders are lead into the theatre. The mass of Germans,
clutching red tickets in their palms, are led into the auditorium last.
Inside we see a
sad looking character in Jewish garb, sitting morosely on a stall and rummaging
through a plastic rucksack, looking like the lost boy on a school trip. When
the play begins, he is joined on stage by the other five actors, including
Brunet looking suitably American in baseball hat and aviators, one actress in
traditional East Asian wear and another in a Muslim shawl. Each clearly
represents not simply a culture, but the stereotype that is cast upon
individuals from that culture; that which Brunet is attempting to wrench open.
Yet such stereotypes are continually presented on stage to comic effect
throughout the evening, whether it is the Turk laying out his tea-set with
painstaking care or the proud Yorkshireman with the plumy voice. Because of
this, Brunet runs the risk of reinforcing these stereotypes as opposed to
breaking them down.
The play
continues with irritable accounts of the staff in Starbucks refusing to respond
in German, or being constantly asked, ‘No but seriously, where are you really from?’, refracted and repeated by
from varying perspectives. It soon becomes apparent that the only thing to be
comprehensively broken down and explored is the set. This is principally six
wooden frames with paper screens, that are re-arranged, dismantled, toppled, walked
through and twisted throughout the evening, representing booths, and doorways,
and ironing boards, eventually all brought to the floor and ripped into their
component parts. In deconstructing these barriers and boundaries Brunet shows
the liberation - or wasteland - that will emerge when stereotypes and assumed
differences are offered the same treatment. However by constantly tampering
with the set he stalls any pace that the piece may hope to accumulate, and
instead of intrigue and insight the audience is offered tedium and weariness. More
effort should have been spent on stretching and exploring the question of what
makes a real Berliner, achieved through a more nuanced engagement with the
interviews and the theatrical versatility of the actors, who in comparison to
the six wooden frames come across static. At times it appears that we are
simply watching a group of friends gossiping about their travails as they embark
on a communal evening of DIY. We are offered brief moments of excitement when a
door frame occasionally falls down.
At one point in
the production the six sit around a table and push a camera into each other’s
faces while they are speaking. This is projected on to the stage, showing a
dark and patchy picture of disorientated faces, like an amateur and
intimidating interrogation video. This effect is unnerving, particularly when
one of the actress recounts being confronted by neo-Nazis screaming ‘Auslander
Aus!’ However this section at the table is also stretched out until it loses
all drama. When a few muted clips of some of the real life interviews are
shown, I wondered whether anything had been gained by presenting these stories
in the theatre, and if simply an edited version of the research would have been
more powerful.
At the end of
the play the cast leave the stage chattering away to each other and one wishes
that the audience had as much to chew upon when walking out of the theatre. It
appears that the hard work of Brunet and his actors was spent in the conception
and embryotic development of the play and not in its deployment. Sixty fingers
wriggled into the colour and diversity of Berlin, and when put together on
stage, glopped into a bland grey of generic urbanity and common complaints. An
interesting result to consider in itself, but not, I believe, the intention of
‘Echter Berliner.’
Bertie Digby Alexander
Berlin 2013
No comments:
Post a Comment